I had a particularly thoughtful reader email me this week, interested in taking the plunge herself. I thought you all might be interested in her concerns (as they are so many of ours), and my answers. I felt like her questions allowed me to articulate some things I hadn’t yet. Enjoy:
Dear Cate,
Found your TPP blog and am utterly terrified yet intrigued by it. I feel like I am an inner minimalist who just needs to be freed — and a project like this could perhaps begin to do that. But, as I said before, the first feeling I have when considering it is terror — which tells me this probably needs to happen. I’m emailing you before I change my mind and chicken out. It really is amazing how many of my issues immediately start coming out when I just press on a “simple” area like my clothing.
My husband and I will be moving across the country again this summer, so that affords me the perfect opportunity to purge. At the same time, it also seems like an un-ideal time due to the fact that I will be making first impressions all over again.
Besides that, my initial concern about getting started on it is that I want to have grown-up pieces (as you say), but don’t have the money to stockpile them in the beginning. (Someday it will all be Emerson Fry, right? Right? Please say it will happen!) So, what do I do in the mean time? Is it against the rules to start with 20 but as you get money plan to replace piece by piece over the year? Or is that not the point?
I really just needed to say all that to someone, and I’d be interested to get your thoughts. Thank you for doing something inspiring. I hope I have the guts to try it soon.
My reply:
I’m excited that you’re interested in the Twenty Pieces Project. Your fears are identical to my major reservations with the project (reservations that still exist, over a third of the way through our year). So I know exactly what you’re feeling!
Julie and I have somewhat different views on this (and it’s something I’ve been meaning to write about for a while), but ultimately, I think Twenty Pieces is about having what you love and need, nothing less, and nothing more. As I’ve leaned into this project a bit more, I’ve found a great deal of freedom in it, but have also been thinking quite a bit about how to make it sustainable for the long term.
Julie’s sense of creativity and adventure causes her to embrace the challenge of just twenty pieces differently than I would. If I have a pair of classic and tailored slim black trousers that no longer fit correctly, my tendency would be to replace them with identical ones that do. Julie would make them into shorts or a hat or something. For me, Twenty Pieces is about having the right things: acknowledging what you actually need for your lifestyle and body, finding the best version you can afford and owning only that.
Ideally for me, this would mean Emerson Fry shift dresses, Lanvin flats, and a whiskey colored leather Mulberry tote but, as you say, finances get in the way of that dream. So for now I have Tahari flats bought at Marshalls, Jcrew sweaters and pencil skirts, and a dark, antique leather Coach bag that I bought 6 years ago. It could be much worse; it could also definitely be better.
One of the problems of not being able to buy quality pieces is that cheaper clothes definitely wear out. No one who designs for the Gap is expecting their tshirts to be one of two in a closet and last a year. Most inexpensive pieces are designed for a consumeristic, throwaway culture and so can’t be relied on. For that reason, I think replacing pieces is inevitable, and if you can replace them with better versions of what you really need for your lifestyle, so much the better.
This is becoming enormously long-winded, but I guess the gist of it is this: I really think you’ll enjoy freeing your “inner-minimalist” by purging excess from your closet, and replacing items as you can afford to is a really reasonable way to keep a sustainably minimalist wardrobe. If you do decide to make the leap, let me know!